Pilot and Pivot: Managing Innovation in Membership Bodies with Conviction and Flexibility
- Andrew Chamberlain

- Aug 21
- 4 min read
Membership bodies are not famous for moving fast and nor should they be. Their role is to serve a defined constituency with stability, credibility, and a long-term vision; but stability is not the same as stagnation. Standing still while the environment changes is as risky as rushing into every new fad. The most effective associations understand this, and they embrace the pilot and pivot approach, managing innovation and change with both conviction and flexibility.
The principle is simple: when you identify a promising new initiative, you launch it as a pilot. You give it clear objectives, the resources it needs, and the leadership focus it deserves. You run it with conviction (you’re not half-hearted about it) but you also keep your eyes open and your options alive. If evidence shows it needs to change course, you pivot with purpose rather than defending a flawed approach out of pride or sunk cost.
Why “Fail Fast, Fail Often” Isn’t the Answer
In the start-up world, the mantra of “fail fast and fail often” has become a badge of honour. But in membership organisations, failure is not a strategy, it’s an event with consequences. When you are working with members’ subscriptions, industry reputation, and sometimes even public trust, frequent visible failure erodes confidence and undermines engagement.
That doesn’t mean you avoid risk altogether. Risk is unavoidable in innovation; what matters is how you manage it. The pilot and pivot approach contains risk without suffocating initiative. A pilot is by definition time-bound, scoped, and resourced to explore an opportunity without committing the whole organisation. A pivot allows you to take what you’ve learned and redirect your energy before a small problem becomes an expensive mistake.
Piloting: Testing Without Paralysis
A pilot is not just a “small version” of an idea but a structured experiment. Done properly, it should:
Be Clearly Defined: Everyone involved needs to know the goals, the target audience, the success metrics, and the timeline. Vague pilots drift into open-ended projects that are neither evaluated nor concluded.
Have a Decision Point: You must set a date and a process for deciding whether to scale, adapt, or stop. Without this, pilots linger indefinitely, draining resources and creating “zombie projects” that nobody owns.
Capture Learning: Even if the pilot is not continued, the lessons should inform future work. In a healthy innovation culture, a “no-go” decision is not failure; it’s knowledge gained at manageable cost.
For example, an association considering a new online training programme might pilot it with one member segment, using minimal technology investment, and track participation, feedback, and learning outcomes. The pilot is small enough to manage risk but real enough to generate meaningful evidence.
Pivoting: Responding Without Losing Direction
A pivot is a purposeful change in strategy, direction, or execution based on evidence, not whim. It’s about adapting to reality, not abandoning the mission.
In membership bodies, pivots are often triggered by:
Member Feedback: If an initiative isn’t resonating, you don’t keep pushing the same message harder. You adjust the content, delivery, or target audience.
External Change: Regulation shifts, market disruptions, or new technologies can make your initial approach obsolete or less relevant.
Internal Constraints: Budget, staffing, or competing priorities may require you to rethink scope or timing.
The art of pivoting lies in maintaining clarity of purpose. You may change the “how” and the “what,” but the “why” should stay constant. If your association’s mission is to advance professional standards, that mission doesn’t change, but the programmes, formats, or partnerships you use to deliver on it may pivot multiple times over their lifespan.
Balancing Conviction and Flexibility
The tension between conviction and flexibility is where many associations stumble. Too much conviction without flexibility leads to stubbornness: ploughing ahead with a failing project because it was “approved” or because changing course might be seen as weakness. Too much flexibility without conviction leads to drift: constantly chasing new ideas without committing long enough to see results.
Successful membership bodies strike the balance by:
Backing Pilots Properly: Treat a pilot as seriously as a full-scale launch in terms of planning, leadership attention, and member communication. If you’re going to test something, test it well.
Embedding Review Points: Build in opportunities to pause, reflect, and decide on a pivot. Don’t wait for a crisis.
Communicating the Journey: Members respect transparency. If you explain that you’re piloting an initiative to test its value, and then pivot based on clear findings, you build trust rather than erode it.
The Cultural Shift Required
Piloting and pivoting are not just project management tools; they require a culture that values evidence over ego. This means:
Board Buy-In: Boards must understand that a decision to stop or change a project is a sign of good governance, not failure.
Staff Empowerment: Teams need permission to surface problems early without fear of blame.
Member Engagement: Pilots can be a powerful way to involve members in shaping new services, making them co-creators rather than passive recipients.
In associations where “not failing” is the overriding priority, innovation becomes paralysed. In those where “moving fast” is prized above all else, members can feel like guinea pigs in a series of half-baked experiments. The pilot and pivot approach provides a disciplined middle ground.
Final thoughts
Standing still is not a safe option for membership bodies. Industries evolve, member needs shift, and technology creates both opportunities and threats. The organisations that thrive are those that innovate with discipline: piloting initiatives with conviction, evaluating honestly, and pivoting when the evidence demands it.
In this way, you avoid the waste and reputational damage of high-profile failures, while also avoiding the slow fade into irrelevance that comes from inaction. Pilots let you move forward with control; pivots keep you aligned with reality. Together, they turn change from a threat into a capability, one that your members will come to see as a defining strength of your organisation.




Comments